Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.

Nature

volume 587, pages54–58(2020)Cite this article

Magnetars are highly magnetized young neutron stars that occasionally produce enormous bursts and flares of X-rays and γ-rays1. Of the approximately thirty magnetars currently known in our Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds, five have exhibited transient radio pulsations2,3. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration bursts of radio waves arriving from cosmological distances4, some of which have been seen to repeat5,6,7,8. A leading model for repeating FRBs is that they are extragalactic magnetars, powered by their intense magnetic fields9,10,11. However, a challenge to this model is that FRBs must have radio luminosities many orders of magnitude larger than those seen from known Galactic magnetars. Here we report the detection of an extremely intense radio burst from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 using the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) FRB project. The fluence of this two-component bright radio burst and the estimated distance to SGR 1935+2154 together imply a burst energy at 400 to 800 megahertz of approximately 3 × 1034 erg, which is three orders of magnitude higher than the burst energy of any radio-emitting magnetar detected thus far. Such a burst coming from a nearby galaxy (at a distance of less than approximately 12 megaparsecs) would be indistinguishable from a typical FRB. However, given the large gaps in observed energies and activity between the brightest and most active FRB sources and what is observed for SGR 1935+2154-like magnetars, more energetic and active sources—perhaps younger magnetars—are needed to explain all observations.

The data used in this publication are available at https://chime-frb-open-data.github.io and in the repository at https://doi.org/10.11570/20.0006.

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Olausen, S. A. & Kaspi, V. M. The McGill Magnetar Catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 212, 6 (2014).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T. & Lorimer, D. R. Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 4 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. CHIME/FRB detection of eight new repeating fast radio burst sources. Astrophys. J. Became. 885, 24 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Kumar, P. et al. Faint repetitions from a bright fast radio burst source. Astrophys. J. Became. 887, 30 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Fonseca, E. et al. Nine new repeating fast radio burst sources from CHIME/FRB. Astrophys. J. Became. 891, 6 (2020).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Lyubarsky, AND. A model for fast extragalactic radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, L9–L13 (2014).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B. & Sironi, L. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 4091–4106 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Project: system overview. Astrophys. J. 863, 48 (2018).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Israel, G. L. et al. The discovery, monitoring and environment of SGR J1935+2154. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 3448–3456 (2016).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Cordes, J. M. & Lazio, T. J. W. NE2001. I. A new model for the galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207156 (2002).

Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N. & Wang, N. A new electron-density model for estimation of pulsar and FRB distances. Astrophys. J. 835, 29 (2017).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

He, C., Ng, C.-Y. & Kaspi, V. The correlation between dispersion measure and X-ray column density from radio pulsars. Astrophys. J. 768, 64 (2013).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Kothes, R., Sun, X., Gaensler, B. & Reich, W. A radio continuum and polarization study of SNR G57.2+0.8 associated with magnetar SGR 1935+2154. Astrophys. J. 852, 54 (2018).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Zhang, C. F. et al. A highly polarised radio burst detected from SGR 1935+2154 by FAST. Astron. Telegr. 13699 (2020).

Zhou, P. et al. Revisiting the distance, environment and supernova properties of SNR G57.2+0.8 that hosts SGR 1935+2154. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03517 (2020).

Mereghetti, S. et al. INTEGRAL IBIS and SPI-ACS detection of a hard X-ray counterpart of the radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13685 (2020).

Ridnaia, A. et al. Konus-Wind observation of hard X-ray counterpart of the radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13688 (2020).

Zhang, S. N. et al. Insight-HXMT X-ray and hard X-ray detection of the double peaks of the fast radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13696 (2020).

Zhang, S. N. et al. Geocentric time correction for Insight-HXMT detection of the X-ray counterpart of the FRB by CHIME and STARE2 from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13704 (2020).

Tendulkar, S. P., Kaspi, V. M. & Patel, C. Radio nondetection of the SGR 1806–20 giant flare and implications for fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 827, 59 (2016).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Scholz, P. et al. Simultaneous X-ray, gamma-ray, and radio observations of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. 846, 80 (2017).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

von Kienlin, A. Fermi GBM GRBs 191104 A, B, C and triggers 594534420/191104185 and 594563923/191104527 are not GRBs. GCN Circ. 26163 (2019).

Ambrosi, E., D’Elia, V., Kennea, J. A. & Palmer, D. Trigger 933276: Swift detection of further activity from SGR 1935+2154. GCN Circ. 26169 (2019).

Palmer, D. Trigger 933285: Swift detection of the brightest burst so far from SGR 1935+2154. GCN Circ. 26171 (2019).

Pearlman, A. B., Majid, W. A., Prince, T. A., Kocz, J. & Horiuchi, S. Pulse morphology of the Galactic Center magnetar PSR J1745–2900. Astrophys. J. 866, 160 (2018).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Hessels, J. W. T. et al. FRB 121102 bursts show complex time–frequency structure. Astrophys. J. Became. 876, 23 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Burgay, M. et al. Search for FRB and FRB-like single pulses in Parkes magnetar data. In Pulsar Astrophysics: the Next Fifty Years (eds Weltevrede, P. et al.) 319–321 (2018).

Bera, A. & Chengalur, J. N. Super-giant pulses from the Crab pulsar: energy distribution and occurrence rate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, L12–L16 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Marcote, B. et al. A repeating fast radio burst source localized to a nearby spiral galaxy. Nature 577, 190–194 (2020).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Patel, C. et al. PALFA single-pulse pipeline: new pulsars, rotating radio transients, and a candidate fast radio burst. Astrophys. J. 869, 181 (2018).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Pol, N., Lam, M. T., McLaughlin, M. A., Lazio, T. J. W. & Cordes, J. M. Estimates of fast radio burst dispersion measures from cosmological simulations. Astrophys. J. 886, 135 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Shannon, R. M. et al. The dispersion–brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey. Nature 562, 386–390 (2018).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Hurley, K. et al. An exceptionally bright flare from SGR 1806–20 and the origins of short-duration γ-ray bursts. Nature 434, 1098–1103 (2005).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Kumar, P., Lu, W. & Bhattacharya, M. Fast radio burst source properties and curvature radiation model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 2726–2739 (2017).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Zhang, AND. G. et al. Fast radio burst 121102 pulse detection and periodicity: a machine learning approach. Astrophys. J. 866, 149 (2018).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Bhandari, S. et al. The Survey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts—II. New FRB discoveries and their follow-up. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 1427–1446 (2018).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Agarwal, D. et al. A fast radio burst in the direction of the Virgo cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 1–8 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Taylor, M. et al. The core collapse supernova rate from the SDSS-II Supernova Survey. Astrophys. J. 792, 135 (2014).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Gourdji, K. et al. A sample of low-energy bursts from FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Became. 877, 19 (2019).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Gajjar, V. et al. Highest frequency detection of FRB 121102 at 4–8 GHz using the Breakthrough Listen digital backend at the Green Bank Telescope. Astrophys. J. 863, 2 (2018).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Bannister, K. W. et al. A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance. Science 365, 565–570 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Ng, C. et al. CHIME FRB: an application of FFT beamforming for a radio telescope. In Proc. XXXII General Assembly and Scientific Symp. Intl Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS) J33-2 (2017).

Masui, K. W. et al. Algorithms for FFT beamforming radio interferometers. Astrophys. J. 879, 16 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 306 (2013).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Newburgh, L. B. et al. Calibrating CHIME: a new radio interferometer to probe dark energy. Proc. SPIE 9145, 91454V (2014).

Google ScholarÂ

Berger, P. et al. Holographic beam mapping of the CHIME pathfinder array. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI (eds Hall, H. J., Gilmozzi, R. & Marshall, H. K.) 99060D (SPIE, 2016).

Bandura, K. et al. Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) pathfinder. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V (eds Stepp, L. M., Gilmozzi, R. & Hall, H. J.) 914522 (SPIE, 2014).

Bandura, K. et al. ICE: a scalable, low-cost FPGA-based telescope signal processing and networking system. J. Astron. Instrum. 5, 1641005 (2016).

Google ScholarÂ

Burn, B. J. On the depolarization of discrete radio sources by Faraday dispersion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 133, 67–83 (1966).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Brentjens, M. A. & de Bruyn, A. G. Faraday rotation measure synthesis. Astron. Astrophys. 441, 1217–1228 (2005).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Sobey, C. et al. Low-frequency Faraday rotation measures towards pulsars using LOFAR: probing the 3D Galactic halo magnetic field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 3646–3664 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Coin, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proc. Second Intl Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’96 (eds Simoudis, E., Han, J. & Fayyad, U.) 226–231 (AAAI, 1996).

Arnaud, K. A. Xspec: the first ten years. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V (eds Jacoby, G. & Barnes, J.) 17 (ASP, 1996).

Karachentsev, I. D. & Kaisina, E. I. Star formation properties in the local volume galaxies via Hα and far-ultraviolet fluxes. Astron. J. 146, 46 (2013).

ADSÂ

Google ScholarÂ

Jarrett, T. H. et al. The WISE Extended Source Catalog (WXSC). I. The 100 largest galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 245, 25 (2019).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

Gehrels, N. Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data. Astrophys. J. 303, 336–346 (1986).

ADSÂ
HOME

Google ScholarÂ

We thank the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, operated by the National Research Council Canada, for hospitality and expertise. The CHIME/FRB Project is funded by a grant from the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) 2015 Innovation Fund (Project 33213), as well as by the provinces of British Columbia and Quebec, and by the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of Toronto. Additional support was provided by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), McGill University and the McGill Space Institute via the Trottier Family Foundation, and the University of British Columbia. CHIME is funded by a grant from the CFI Leading Edge Fund (2012) (project 31170) and by contributions from the provinces of British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario. The Dunlap Institute is funded by an endowment established by the David Dunlap family and the University of Toronto. Research at Perimeter Institute is supported by the Government of Canada through Industry Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. M.B. is supported by a Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologie Québec (FRQNT) Doctoral Research Award. P.C. is supported by an FRQNT Doctoral Research Award. M.D. is supported by a Killam Fellowship and receives support from an NSERC Discovery Grant, CIFAR, and from the FRQNT Centre de Recherche en Astrophysique du Québec (CRAQ). B.M.G. acknowledges the support of NSERC through grant RGPIN-2015-05948, and of the Canada Research Chairs programme. J.W.K. is supported by NSF award 1458952. V.M.K. holds the Lorne Trottier Chair in Astrophysics and Cosmology, a Distinguished James McGill Professorship and receives support from an NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN 228738-13) and a Gerhard Herzberg Award, from an R. Howard Webster Foundation Fellowship from CIFAR, and from the FRQNT CRAQ. D.M. is a Banting Postdoctoral Fellow. S.M.R. is a CIFAR Fellow and is supported by the NSF Physics Frontiers Center, award 1430284. U.-L.P. receives support from Ontario Research Fund–Research Excellence (ORF-RE) programme, CFI, the Simons Foundation and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. U.-L.P. acknowledges support from NSERC (grant RGPIN-2019-067 and CRD 523638-201). Z.P. is supported by a Schulich Graduate Fellowship from McGill University. P.S. is a Dunlap Fellow and an NSERC Postdoctoral Fellow. FRB research at UBC is supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant and by CIFAR.

B. C. Andersen, M. Bhardwaj, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, P. Chawla, J.-F. Cliche, A. P. Curtin, M. Dobbs, E. Fonseca, A. Josephy, V. M. Kaspi, M. Merryfield, D. Michilli, A. Naidu, C. Patel, Z. Pleunis, S. R. Siegel, S. Singh, C. M. Tan, S. P. Tendulkar, D. Wulf & A. V. Zwaniga

B. C. Andersen, M. Bhardwaj, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, P. Chawla, J.-F. Cliche, A. P. Curtin, M. Dobbs, E. Fonseca, A. Josephy, V. M. Kaspi, M. Merryfield, D. Michilli, A. Naidu, Z. Pleunis, S. R. Siegel, S. Singh, C. M. Tan, S. P. Tendulkar, D. Wulf & A. V. Zwaniga

Department of Computer Science, Math, Physics, and Statistics, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Herzberg Research Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, National Research Council Canada, Penticton, British Columbia, Canada

All authors from the CHIME/FRB Collaboration had either leadership or significant supporting roles in one or more of: the management, development and construction of the CHIME telescope, the CHIME/FRB instrument and the CHIME/FRB software data pipeline, the commissioning and operations of the CHIME/FRB instrument, the data analysis and preparation of this manuscript. All authors from the CHIME Collaboration had either leadership or significant supporting roles in the management, development and construction of the CHIME telescope.

Correspondence to
P. Scholz.

Peer review information Nature thanks Evan Keane and Amanda Weltman for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisherâ????s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

a–d, Dynamic spectra and band-averaged time series (referenced to the geocentre) of fitted burst models (a), beam-attenuated burst models (b), burst data as in Fig. 1 (c) and fit residuals (d). Dynamic spectra are displayed at 0.98304-ms and 1.5625-MHz resolution, with intensity values capped at the 1st and 99th percentiles, except in d where values are capped at ±3σ around 0. The time series of b–d have the same scaling. The beam attenuation of the maxima in the model dynamic spectra is about 1,700×.

a, The Faraday spectrum FB1 for the first sub-burst from Stokes Q and U after correcting for a leakage between Stokes U and V. b, Faraday spectrum ({F}_{{rm{B}}2}^{ast }) for the second sub-burst from a single polarized flux of the ARO 10-m dish. c, The cross spectrum Fcross = (sqrt{{F}_{{rm{B}}1}{F}_{{rm{B}}2}^{ast }}) from the ARO 10-m dish, magnified near the peak. d, The cross spectrum from CHIME intensity data. The oscillations of the Stokes Q from Faraday rotation have leaked to the summed intensity, owing to the different response of the two linear receivers in the far sidelobe. The black lines show the amplitude of the spectra; the blue and orange lines are the real and imaginary parts of the spectra, respectively. The phase of the cross spectrum corresponds to the PA difference between the two bursts. When the real part approaches the amplitude, the two bursts have the same PA. The yellow dashed vertical line is drawn at RM = 116 rad m−2. L is the linear polarization, I is the total intensity and their indices refer to the first and second bursts.

a–d, The spectrum of the first burst in the Stokes I parameter and its cubic spline-smoothed version (black line) (a), the Stokes Q parameter divided by the total linear polarization, L (b), the Stokes U parameter divided by the total linear polarization (c), and the uncalibrated polarization angle, ψ (d). The frequency channels with greater polarized intensity are indicated with darker points. The best-fit model of the Faraday rotation modulation with an RM of 116 rad m−2 is indicated by the black lines in b and c. The best-fit model of the uncalibrated polarization angle is indicated with the solid red line in d. Error bars are 1σ.

Andersen, B., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M. et al. A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar.
Nature 587, 54–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Nature |

News & Views

Advanced search

Nature

ISSN 1476-4687 (online)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2863-y

Fast radio burst, Magnetar, Star, Astronomy, Milky Way, Galaxy

World news – GB – A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar

Building on its expertise in the areas of digital, technologies and processes , CSS Engineering you in your most ambitious transformation projects and helps you bring out new ideas, new offers, new modes of collaboration, new ways of producing and selling.

CSS Engineering is involved in projects each customer as if it were his own. We believe a consulting company should be more than an advisor. We put ourselves in the place of our customers, to align we incentives to their goals, and collaborate to unlock the full potential their business. This establishes deep relationships and enjoyable.

Our services:

  1. Create professional websites
  2. Hosting high performance and unlimited
  3. Sale and video surveillance cameras installation
  4. Sale and Installation of security system and alarm
  5. E-Marketing

All our achievements here https://www.css-engineering.com/en/works/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here